|
|
Movie Review: The Claim Story: What separates a hit from a miss? Hmmm! Let
me count the ways... This film had a lot going for it. The incredible
beauty of the location shots (Alberta, Canada and Colorado), a credible
cast, and as a source, the Thomas Hardy novel The
Mayor of Casterbridge. So what happened? Well, it just drags on
and on. After one hour I started looking at my watch and fidgeting in
my seat. (Movie pal, Mark and I, kept crashing our feet into one another
from all of our fidgeting.) I thought my watch had broken because time
simply stood still. The story's elements had promise, even though much
had been changed from the book. The wealthy Mayor of the town, Kingdom
Come (don't you just love that name)? made his fortune through a gold
claim (it is 1867, in the wintry California High Sierras) and hides
a dirty little secret about his claim and his past (who doesn't)? There's
still gold in them thar hills, the coming of the railroad and
the imminent changes about to take place in America when the railroad
finally connects both coasts. We also have prostitutes, a dying (a la
Streep) wife, a pouty daughter and lots and lots of snow. The story
gets muddled and wanders all over the place. Director Michael
Winterbottom (quite an appropriate name for a film like this)
and writer Frank Cottrell Boyce missed a great opportunity
by throwing way too much into the film. I ended up not caring about
any character except for the wealthy Mayor. There were too many under-developed
characters and not enough story. However, if you like visually stunning
landscapes, period pieces and an affection and interest in how people
lived in this climate and time period this film could be for you. But
be warned, wear a sweater - because you can get very cold looking at
all of that snow.
Acting: Scottish actor Peter Mullan
(My Name is Joe) is fabulous as the Mayor. Milla Jovovich,
as the Madam made me squirm (but I did like her authentic looking gold
tooth). Nastassia Kinski, as the dying wife (remember
her in Hardy's Tess)? was adequate while coughing up blood
for much of the film. Sarah Polley (The Sweet Hereafter)
as the daughter. was very annoying and much too contemporary in language
and look for her part to work for me. And finally, Wes Bentley
(the young hottie from American Beauty) looked uncomfortable
in this period piece and I did not buy his role at all - but I did like
looking at him.
Critters: Hard working livestock and lots and lots
of horses.
Food: Food seems to have been replaced with booze in
the High Sierras.
Visual Art: The landscape was a visual treat.
Blatant Product Placement: It is 1867 - I am not sure
any company could really work their product into this period piece but
I am sure they tried.)
Soundtrack: Heavy on the violins.
Opening Titles: None
Theater Audience: An odd mix. There was a handful of
twenty something's (they sat very far up front). A bunch of my contemporaries.
A little of this and a little of that. It was the first time in a long
time that I could not get a fix'on the crowd, which is interesting by
itself.
Squirm Scale: I just squirmed in my seat because I
am a squirmer.
Predictability Level: High (even without knowing the
story).
Tissue Usage: I had one tear (not tissue worthy)
Oscar Worthy: No
Nit Picking: I know that the use of out of focus images
is supposed to be artsy but there were too many beginnings and endings
of scenes where the images were out of focus. I thought at times the
cinematographer might have fallen asleep and I just wanted to rub my
eyes to clear up the picture.
Big Screen or Rental: Who cares? But you might consider
renting some of the other movies I mentioned in the acting category
where these stars really do shine. The Sweet Hereafter, My Name
is Joe, 'Tess of the D'Urbervilles, and for laughs, Messenger, The Story
of Joan of Arc.
Length: 2 very long hours.
LOBO HOWLS: 5
|